Future Cities Lab: The Making Of An Exhibition
- Jerica Liew
- Nov 29, 2025
- 3 min read
Most projects start as briefs, while others begin as conversations.
This one started with a text from an alumnus and ended with our work printed metres tall, wrapping the walls of Singapore’s National Design Centre. Somewhere along the way, KOVA found itself translating 15 years of urban research into a visual system that people could walk through, touch, and experience.
This is how it happened.
A Shared Language in Grids and Clarity
The project began when KOVA was contacted by a member of Future Cities Laboratory Global (FCL Global), a collaboration between ETH Zurich and Singapore's universities (NUS, NTU and SUTD). The organisation was seeking design support to translate FCL's research, spread across 13 different modules, into public-facing, digestible content.

KOVA's approach aligned naturally with the brief. The studio's focus on the Swiss Style (International Typographic Style) resonated with FCL's Swiss institutional roots, making the partnership a logical fit.
Designing An Exhibition Brand Identity
The symposium needed an exhibition identity, something that extended FCL’s corporate brand while standing on its own in physical space.

We pared the identity down to its essentials. The yellow stayed as the core cue, while the other colours stepped aside. What emerged was a system that felt clearer and more intentional.
It was our first time developing an exhibition identity at full scale, which meant the work had to operate beyond a screen. Print, distance, lighting and human movement all came into play, and the design needed to hold up across each touchpoint.
Taking cues from the International Typographic Style, the system was anchored by grid logic, clear hierarchy and a left-aligned rhythm that kept information accessible. A single mustard yellow guided the visual language, while small symbols (+) and arrows shaped wayfinding. Typography did the heavy lifting, with form serving communication first.
Designing With Memory Gaps

The centrepiece was a 15-year timeline wall.
This deliverable went through more than ten drafts, layers of revisions and a long trail of conversations across teams and time zones. Mapping fifteen years of research, leadership, milestones and publications was less a design task and more an excavation. Institutional memory stretches thin over that kind of timeline, so the process felt closer to detective work than layout.
Long hours spent poring over tiny text came with their own physical reminders, but they also sharpened something important. Precision stops being a stylistic choice when every detail carries weight. The project made that uncomfortably clear. Some assignments teach you more about your own practice than you expect. This was one of them.
Wayfinding With 72 Hours To Go

Three days before launch, another issue surfaced: wayfinding. Singapore Design Week had covered the National Design Centre in competing posters, and the visual field was already overloaded. Our signage needed to hold its ground without adding to the noise. The only workable answer was restraint. We pared it back to distilled type, clear symbols and straightforward directional logic. The goal was not to outshine the surroundings, but to offer guidance that stayed legible within them.

On the Walls
Then came the moment.

Seeing the work leave the safety of screens and take over physical walls at one of Singapore’s key design venues was a shift in scale. The manifesto wall was the first encounter. Bright yellow, direct, and placed exactly where the eye lands on entry. Climate, systems and urban futures set the tone before anything else. It functioned as visual infrastructure, shaping how visitors met the exhibition from the first step inside.

Our graphics sat beside scientific research across thirteen modules. The task was to create a controlled sense of intensity. Enough distinction to arrest attention. Enough cohesion to hold the modules together as a single body of work.

This project was a reminder that beyond aesthetics, design is about translation, clarity, and responsibility. Seeing our work operate at architectural scale, sit beside real research, and guide real human movement changed how we think about what a design studio can be. FCL trusted us with their story, and we built the framework to help people see it. And honestly, that's the good stuff.

